Skip to content

Bug 2034484: feat: updated library-go#972

Merged
openshift-merge-robot merged 3 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
eggfoobar:library_go_bump
Dec 23, 2021
Merged

Bug 2034484: feat: updated library-go#972
openshift-merge-robot merged 3 commits intoopenshift:masterfrom
eggfoobar:library_go_bump

Conversation

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@eggfoobar eggfoobar commented Dec 15, 2021

Bumping the library-go dependency to latest, this should take advantage of leader election changes for SNO clusters proposed in this library-go PR and performance improvements in this PR.

Changes:

  • updated library-go dep to latest
  • updated start command for the controllers to use library-go defaults for leader election

Signed-off-by: ehila ehila@redhat.com

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 15, 2021
@eggfoobar eggfoobar changed the title [WIP] feat: updated library-go feat: updated library-go Dec 15, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Dec 15, 2021
Comment thread pkg/operator/sync.go Outdated
}

func (optr *Operator) syncValidatingWebhook() error {
expectedGeneration := resourcemerge.ExpectedValidatingWebhooksConfiguration(mapiwebhooks.NewValidatingWebhookConfiguration().Name, optr.generations)
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not 100% sure on the ramifications of this change here, would love some input and context. The expectedGeneration was removed from this methods signature per this PR. Any potential problems that we might need to consider here?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 16, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Dec 16, 2021
@damdo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

damdo commented Dec 16, 2021

/test unit

Signed-off-by: ehila <ehila@redhat.com>
updated leader election to delegate to library-go for configs
leader election is now topology aware for its configs

Signed-off-by: ehila <ehila@redhat.com>
@damdo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

damdo commented Dec 21, 2021

/retest-required

@eggfoobar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/retitle Bug 2034484: feat: updated library-go
This PR bumps to latest library-go to utilize changes for performance gains on SNO DU clusters

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot changed the title feat: updated library-go Bug 2034484: feat: updated library-go Dec 21, 2021
@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 21, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Dec 21, 2021

@eggfoobar: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 2034484, which is valid. The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.10.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.10.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Bugzilla (jhou@redhat.com), skipping review request.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2034484: feat: updated library-go

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Dec 21, 2021
@ggiguash
Copy link
Copy Markdown

/retest-required

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@JoelSpeed JoelSpeed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

Comment thread cmd/machine-api-operator/start.go Outdated
"strconv"

osconfigv1 "github.com/openshift/api/config/v1"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This new line seems to be randomly added, can we remove it please?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure thing, updated

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Dec 22, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JoelSpeed

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 22, 2021
Signed-off-by: ehila <ehila@redhat.com>
@damdo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

damdo commented Dec 22, 2021

/retest-required

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Dec 22, 2021

@eggfoobar: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia f1655ab link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-virtualmedia
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade f1655ab link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-upgrade f1655ab link false /test e2e-vsphere-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-disruptive f1655ab link false /test e2e-aws-disruptive
ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack f1655ab link false /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@damdo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

damdo commented Dec 23, 2021

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 23, 2021
@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 8e88153 into openshift:master Dec 23, 2021
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented Dec 23, 2021

@eggfoobar: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Bugzilla bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

Bugzilla bug 2034484 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

Details

In response to this:

Bug 2034484: feat: updated library-go

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/severity-high Referenced Bugzilla bug's severity is high for the branch this PR is targeting. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants